<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sinjo &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sinjakli.co.uk/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sinjakli.co.uk</link>
	<description>Blogging is just a lesser form of productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPad: Why?</title>
		<link>http://blog.sinjakli.co.uk/2010/01/28/ipad-why/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sinjakli.co.uk/2010/01/28/ipad-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sinjo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetcompsoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sinjakli.co.uk/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPad is a disappointment. Fact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the usual excess of hype that lead up to the launch of a new Apple product, I can&#8217;t help but feel completely underwhelmed. I&#8217;ll be honest, I&#8217;m not a user of any Apple products; however, I&#8217;d be lying if I said I didn&#8217;t like any of them. The iPod is a nice music player. Having used a few friends&#8217; I can say that I like the UI and that there was no huge learning curve to using the device. The iPhone was certainly responsible for pushing the idea of smart phones to a greater audience and once again did so in a nice tidy package that was very usable.</p>
<p>The iPad though, leaves a lot to be desired. It seems like Apple have produced an enlarged version of the iPhone (but not a phone, so really more like an iPod Touch), without applying significant work to it. It suffers the same issues as the iPhone, those being:</p>
<ul>
<li>A total lack of multitasking. Running applications in the background is not a new concept, and failing to provide such functionality seems like a massive step backwards. I&#8217;ve felt this about the iPhone for a while and it seems even more crippling for a device which truthfully should provide more.</li>
<li>No camera included. While it&#8217;s obvious that this device isn&#8217;t for taking photos, I don&#8217;t understand why it doesn&#8217;t have a small, integrated webcam on the front. Being able to make video calls on, for instance, Skype seems like a reasonably sensible use-case for this device.</li>
<li>Lack of a hardware keyboard. This is a more debatable point, but to me it makes little sense. With a device of this size I don&#8217;t envisage that an on screen keyboard would be pleasant to use. Selling a keyboard dock isn&#8217;t really a solution as you&#8217;re just increasing the amount of clutter that you have to carry with you to use the device as you want to.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m left not really knowing who this product is aimed at. Which group of people want a larger iPhone whose main advantages are negated by dodgy design decisions? It seems more  like they&#8217;re simply riding the wave of success which means that people will end up buying them simply because it&#8217;s the latest thing to emerge from the shinies factory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sinjakli.co.uk/2010/01/28/ipad-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
